Environmental, Climatic, Geographic, and Astronomical Influences on Skin Aging

Skin aging is a multifactorial process driven by intrinsic factors (chronological aging and genetics) and extrinsic factors (environmental and lifestyle exposures). Evidence suggests that extrinsic influences – often summarized as the skin exposome – contribute substantially to visible skin aging, accounting for the majority of age-related changes in skin appearance[1]. Extrinsic aging (or photoaging) manifests as wrinkles, loss of elasticity, dyspigmentation, dryness, and other texture changes that overlay the basal effects of time. Key environmental and climatic factors such as solar ultraviolet radiation, visible light, temperature extremes, humidity, and air pollution have been implicated in accelerating skin aging phenotypes[2,5]. Geographic variables like latitude (which influences UV intensity) and altitude (thinner atmosphere) further modulate these exposures. Astronomical factors, notably the day-night cycle, underlie circadian rhythms that regulate skin repair; disruption of these rhythms (e.g. due to poor sleep or shift work) can impair skin regeneration and hasten aging[6,7]. Moreover, modern urbanization often combines multiple risk factors – high pollution, heat island effects, and chronic stressors – creating an urban exposome that can detract from skin health and beauty. This article reviews current scientific evidence (2015–2025) on how environmental, climatic, geographic, and astronomical factors influence skin aging and overall skin appearance, drawing on recent systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and original studies.

Ultraviolet Radiation and Photoaging

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun is widely recognized as the primary external driver of skin aging. Cumulative UV exposure causes photoaging, the premature aging of skin, which is characterized by coarse wrinkles, solar elastosis (dermal collagen degeneration), pigmentary changes (lentigines, uneven pigmentation), and telangiectasias. Epidemiological analyses indicate UV is responsible for a large proportion of visible facial aging – on the order of ~80% in some estimates[1]. Wong et al.’s 2021 meta-analysis identified sun exposure as a significant risk factor for wrinkles and pigmented spots: individuals with high daily sun exposure (e.g. >1 hour/day) had nearly double the odds of developing wrinkles compared to those with minimal sun exposure[2]. A dose-response relationship is evident, with greater lifetime UV dose correlating with more severe photoaging[2]. Ultraviolet radiation encompasses UVA (320–400 nm) and UVB (280–320 nm). UVA penetrates into the dermis and induces oxidative stress and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activation, leading to collagen breakdown and loss of elasticity[8]. UVB, while mostly absorbed in the epidermis, causes direct DNA damage (e.g. thymine dimers) and inflammation, contributing to wrinkles and mutagenesis[8]. Over time, chronic UV exposure results in dermal connective tissue damage (collagen fragmentation, abnormal elastin accumulation) and epidermal dysplasia, the histologic hallmarks of photodamaged skin. Clinically, chronically sun-exposed skin (such as the face, neck, and hands in outdoor workers or beachgoers) shows deeper wrinkles and mottled hyperpigmentation compared to sun-protected skin of the same individual[2]. Notably, UV-induced aging is not limited to fair-skinned populations; while darker skin (Fitzpatrick phototypes IV–VI) has more natural melanin protection, it still experiences photoaging (often manifesting more as uneven pigment and texture rather than coarse wrinkles)[9]. Preventive measures against UV are therefore central to maintaining skin youthfulness. Regular sunscreen use has been shown to visibly slow the development of photoaging signs[3]. In summary, UV radiation is the dominant environmental factor in extrinsic skin aging, and mitigating UV exposure remains the most evidence-based strategy to preserve skin appearance.

Visible Light and High-Energy Blue Light

Beyond the ultraviolet spectrum, visible light (400–700 nm) – particularly high-energy visible blue light (~400–500 nm) – has emerged as another contributor to skin aging and pigmentation. Visible light constitutes a large portion of solar radiation and can penetrate the skin to the dermis. Recent studies indicate that blue light can induce oxidative stress in the skin and exacerbate pigmentary changes. For example, exposure to visible blue light has been shown to trigger the production of reactive oxygen species in epidermal cells and promote melanogenesis, leading to persistent hyperpigmentation in darker-skinned individuals[3]. Clinically, this translates to observations that some forms of melasma or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation can worsen with visible light exposure, even when UV is filtered out. Moreover, laboratory experiments have noted that blue light (similar to UVA) can upregulate MMP-1 in dermal fibroblasts, suggesting a potential to degrade collagen and initiate photoaging pathways[10,3]. However, it is important to contextualize the magnitude of blue light exposure from different sources. The sun is the largest source of blue light: midday sunlight delivers a blue light irradiance orders of magnitude higher than that from artificial devices. Indeed, measurements show that the blue light intensity from common electronic screens (phones, computers) is 99–1000 times lower than the blue light intensity in natural sunlight[3]. Thus, while there is concern that chronic use of LED screens and indoor lighting could contribute to aging (sometimes dubbed “digital aging”), current evidence suggests their effect is minimal compared to regular outdoor sun exposure[3]. In practical terms, visible light – especially in sunlight – does contribute to skin aging and uneven skin tone, but protecting skin from UV will also largely mitigate the high-energy visible light risk. Some dermatologists advocate the use of tinted sunscreens or iron oxide-containing formulations for patients with stubborn hyperpigmentation, as these can block visible light wavelengths that transparent sunscreens do not[11]. Overall, while UV remains the chief culprit, visible light (blue light) is an ancillary factor in the skin aging process, particularly relevant to pigmentation and oxidative stress in the skin.

Temperature and Humidity Extremes

Climatic conditions such as ambient temperature and humidity can influence skin condition and may accelerate aging changes when exposure is chronic. High temperatures can have a direct impact on the skin’s structural proteins and vasculature over time. Heat exposure (especially in combination with UV) is known to induce expression of matrix-degrading enzymes and can lead to a phenomenon termed thermal aging, wherein chronically heat-exposed skin (as in glassblowers or chefs) shows elastosis and wrinkles. Humidity levels modify skin hydration: low humidity causes transepidermal water loss, skin dryness, and can make fine lines more apparent, whereas very high humidity might affect skin barrier function and sweating. Until recently, population-level data on temperature/humidity and skin aging were limited. A novel 2025 epidemiological study by Singh et al. investigated the combined long-term effect of heat and humidity on skin aging signs in over 1,500 women[4]. They introduced a Heat Index (HI) to represent combined ambient temperature and relative humidity exposure at participants’ residences over 5 years. After adjusting for sun exposure and age, higher chronic HI was significantly associated with increased facial hyperpigmented macules and deeper wrinkles. Specifically, women living in hotter, more humid climates had higher odds of forehead lentigines and crow’s-feet wrinkles than those in milder climates (e.g., an odds ratio ~1.3 for high HI vs low HI for developing these aging signs)[4]. These findings were robust even after accounting for UV differences, suggesting that prolonged exposure to extreme heat (e.g. tropical or desert climates) can independently contribute to photoaging phenotypes[4]. The biological basis may relate to heat shock protein induction and collagen glycation at higher temperatures, as well as dilation of vessels leading to matrix remodeling. Low humidity, on the other hand, is well known to cause xerosis (dry skin), which can exacerbate the appearance of fine lines and compromise the skin barrier. While less studied in long-term aging, maintaining adequate skin hydration is considered important for skin turgor and elasticity. Very dry environmental air (such as in cold arid winters or air-conditioned environments) can lead to micro-fissures in the stratum corneum and chronic mild irritation. Some evidence suggests that maintaining indoor humidity >30% helps reduce dry skin in the elderly[12], although direct links to wrinkle formation are not fully established. In summary, climatic extremes – chronic heat combined with high humidity, or conversely cold with low humidity – can aggravate skin aging. Global climate change, with more frequent extreme heat events, may further amplify these effects. From a practical standpoint, protecting the skin from excessive heat (e.g. sun or saunas) and using moisturizers in dry conditions are sensible measures to support skin health in various climates.

Air Pollution

Air pollution has emerged as a significant environmental accelerator of skin aging in the past decade. The skin is in direct contact with airborne pollutants, including particulate matter (PM), noxious gases, and environmental chemicals, all of which can induce oxidative stress in cutaneous tissues. Particulate matter, especially fine particles ≤2.5 µm in diameter (PM2.5), has been most strongly implicated in epidemiological studies. Chronic exposure to high levels of PM from traffic exhaust, industrial emissions, or urban smog is associated with increased wrinkle formation and pigment spots on the skin[5]. Notably, a landmark study in Germany first reported that women living in areas with higher traffic-related PM showed more facial lentigines (brown age spots) than those in cleaner air areas, even after controlling for UV exposure and age[17]. Subsequent studies in Asian populations confirmed that traffic-generated pollution contributes to hyperpigmentation and aging: for example, Hüls et al. (2016) found that exposure to traffic-related PM and nitrogen dioxide correlated with a higher count of facial dark spots in both Caucasian and Chinese cohorts[16]. Multiple pollutants are linked to distinct skin aging phenotypes. Nitrogen dioxide (NO₂), a gaseous pollutant from vehicle exhaust, has been tied to an increase in pigment spots as well[5]. Ozone (O₃), a reactive oxygen species present in photochemical smog, causes lipid peroxidation in the skin; epidemiologically, higher chronic ozone exposure has been associated with a loss of skin elasticity and the formation of coarse wrinkles[5]. Indoor air pollution can be harmful too: a study in Chinese women showed that long-term indoor exposure from cooking with solid fuels (biomass smoke) was linked to more wrinkles and pigmentation, similar to the effect of outdoor pollution[15]. All these pollutants trigger oxidative stress in the skin. They generate reactive oxygen species that overwhelm the skin’s antioxidant defenses, leading to oxidative damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA in skin cells[5]. This in turn activates signaling pathways (e.g. aryl hydrocarbon receptors, MAP kinases) that upregulate MMPs and pro-inflammatory mediators, culminating in collagen breakdown and aging changes[5]. Several reviews now conclusively regard air pollution as an extrinsic skin aging factor[5]. Schikowski and Hüls (2020) summarized that the association between traffic-related air pollution and accelerated skin aging (wrinkles, lentigines) is well-established in multiple cohorts[5]. Importantly, pollution and UV radiation may act synergistically: particles on the skin’s surface can generate reactive intermediates under UV, and ozone depletes cutaneous antioxidants like vitamin E, enhancing UV damage[5]. From a public health and dermatologic perspective, strategies such as cleansing the skin to remove particulate matter, using skincare with antioxidants, and creating barrier formulations are being explored to mitigate pollution’s aging effects[5]. In urban centers with heavy smog, these approaches, alongside advocacy for cleaner air, are important for maintaining skin health and beauty.

Geographic Factors: Latitude and Altitude

Latitude and altitude profoundly influence the intensity of environmental exposures, especially UV radiation, and thus can modulate skin aging patterns across different populations. At lower latitudes (close to the equator), the sun’s rays strike the Earth more directly year-round, resulting in consistently high UV indices. Populations living in tropical and subtropical regions generally experience greater cumulative UV doses and often show more pronounced photoaging at earlier ages compared to those in higher latitudes. For instance, fair-skinned individuals in Australia (low latitude, high UV environment) commonly develop deep wrinkles, actinic lentigines, and precancerous skin changes decades earlier than those in northern Europe at higher latitudes[2]. A systematic review of global skin aging noted that differences in perceived age between different countries were largely attributable to environmental UV exposure disparities, with sun-intensive locales associated with older appearance at a given age[2]. Latitude also correlates with cultural behaviors around sun (e.g., use of sun protection), but even with similar behaviors, the ambient UV burden differs. Higher latitude regions (farther from the equator) have lower annual UV exposure, especially in fall/winter, which can afford the skin some recovery time; however, they may have intense UV during long summer days and when reflective snow is present. Altitude is another critical factor: UV radiation intensity increases with elevation because the atmosphere is thinner and absorbs less UV. Roughly, UV levels rise by about 10–12% with every 1000 meters gain in altitude[18]. In high-altitude communities (for example, populations living in the Andes, Himalayas, or Rocky Mountains), the combination of increased UV and often outdoor lifestyles (farming, trekking) leads to accelerated photoaging and a higher incidence of skin cancers. Clinically, older adults from high-altitude areas can exhibit a weather-beaten appearance: deep wrinkles, leathery texture, and telangiectasias, sometimes termed “alpoderma.” Nonetheless, some highland populations with protective pigmentation show remarkable resilience – their skin ages more slowly in certain aspects, hinting at genetic adaptations and the complex interplay of factors. Interestingly, one recent analysis even suggested that extreme altitudes might activate longevity pathways in the body unrelated to skin (e.g., hypoxia-driven antioxidant responses), though any protective effect of altitude on skin aging is not evident[19]. Overall, the consensus is that greater solar UV exposure due to low latitude or high altitude unequivocally exacerbates extrinsic skin aging. In practical terms, geographic risk factors reinforce the need for tailored photoprotection strategies. Those living at high elevations or in equatorial zones should be especially vigilant with sun protection (high-SPF broad-spectrum sunscreens, UV-protective clothing, hats, etc.) year-round. By contrast, individuals in higher latitudes should not overlook UV exposure during summer and winter sports (skiing at altitude, for example, carries significant UV risk). Awareness of one’s geographic context thus helps in adopting appropriate skin preservation measures.

Circadian Rhythms and Skin Repair

The skin is not only influenced by external insults, but also by internal circadian rhythms – the roughly 24-hour biological cycles governed by molecular “clocks” in our cells. Nearly every cell type in skin (keratinocytes, fibroblasts, melanocytes) exhibits circadian regulation of various functions, including cell division, DNA repair, and barrier permeability. These rhythms are synchronized by the master clock in the brain, which is entrained by the astronomical day-night cycle (light and darkness). A growing body of research indicates that circadian rhythms play a significant role in skin health and aging. Under normal conditions, the skin’s clock genes (like CLOCK and BMAL1) help ensure peak activity of DNA repair enzymes and antioxidants in the evening and night, right when the skin is recovering from daytime UV-induced damage[6]. This means that if the circadian timing is optimal, many of the UV-induced DNA lesions incurred during the day are efficiently repaired overnight, preventing accumulation of mutations that drive aging and cancer. Additionally, skin cell proliferation tends to peak at night, aiding regeneration, while processes like transepidermal water loss also follow diurnal variation (higher at night), explaining why nighttime is ideal for applying moisturizers to support the barrier. When circadian rhythms are disrupted – for example, due to chronic sleep deprivation, shift work, or exposure to light at night – the skin’s regenerative capacity is impaired. Evidence of this comes from both animal models and human clinical studies. Su et al. (2024) have reviewed that circadian disruption can exacerbate UV-induced oxidative stress and inflammation in skin, ultimately accelerating aging changes[6]. Clinically, Oyetakin-White et al. (2015) conducted a study on 60 women and found that those with chronic poor sleep (≤5 hours/night, with high sleep disturbance scores) showed significantly more signs of skin aging than good sleepers of the same age[7]. The poor sleepers had increased fine lines, uneven pigmentation, and reduced elasticity. Moreover, their skin had a slower recovery from stressors: after a controlled skin barrier disruption and UV exposure, good sleepers healed faster and had less persistent redness than poor sleepers[7]. Poor sleepers also reported lower self-perceived attractiveness[7], underlining the link between circadian health, skin appearance, and overall beauty. This study provides real-world evidence that the concept of “beauty sleep” has a physiological basis – adequate, regular sleep allows the skin to repair and maintain itself, whereas deficient sleep ages the skin more rapidly. Beyond sleep, other circadian factors include chrononutrition (timing of eating) and hormonal cycles (e.g. nightly melatonin surge, diurnal cortisol variation), which may also impact skin integrity and aging, though these are less studied. What is clear is that maintaining synchrony with natural day-night cycles is beneficial for skin. From a dermatologic care perspective, this opens the door to chronotherapy – timing skincare treatments to the skin’s clock (for instance, applying DNA repair creams or retinoids at night when cell turnover is highest). Overall, preserving healthy circadian rhythms (by prioritizing regular sleep in darkness and daylight exposure in the morning) is a valuable, science-backed recommendation for improving skin appearance and slowing the march of time on the skin.

Urbanization and the “Urban Exposome”

Urbanization has led more than half of the world’s population to live in cities, where they encounter a unique set of environmental conditions that can affect skin aging. City dwellers are typically exposed to higher levels of air pollution, artificial light at night, higher ambient temperatures (urban heat island effect), and often greater psychosocial stress – all factors that may synergistically impair skin health. The term “urban exposome” is used to describe this conglomerate of exposures characteristic of dense urban living. A direct consequence of urban environments is the elevated burden of airborne pollutants, as discussed earlier. Studies comparing urban and rural populations illustrate the skin impact: for example, a study of women in polluted metropolitan Beijing versus cleaner rural regions found the urban group had more and deeper wrinkles and more pigment spots, attributable to pollution exposure differences[15]. Similarly, research in rapidly urbanizing parts of Asia has noted that individuals in cities show signs of extrinsic aging (like dullness, laxity, and mottled pigmentation) at younger ages than their rural counterparts, even accounting for sun exposure. Urban environments also tend to have higher nighttime light (streetlights, billboards) which can suppress melatonin and potentially disrupt residents’ circadian rhythms. Chronic exposure to light pollution might indirectly contribute to skin aging by impairing sleep quality (as discussed above). Moreover, cities often create microclimates: the urban heat island effect means city centers can be several degrees warmer than surrounding areas, possibly enhancing the thermal aging component for inhabitants[20]. Lower humidity in air-conditioned offices or heated apartments during winter can exacerbate dryness and fine lines for urban residents. And although harder to quantify, the stress of urban life (noise, crowding, fast pace) can elevate cortisol levels, which over time may degrade skin collagen and slow wound healing, theoretically contributing to aging. Some researchers have started to draw connections between chronic stress and skin aging via hormonal pathways (e.g. cortisol and ACTH receptors in skin)[13]. It is worth noting that urban populations often have more access to dermatologic care and advanced skincare products, which can counteract some negative factors. Nonetheless, the net effect of urban vs. rural living on skin aging appears to favor rural environments, where air is cleaner and lifestyles may be more in tune with natural day-night cycles. For instance, a multi-city study in China (2018) dubbed “A Tale of Two Cities” compared women from a highly polluted city with those from a less polluted city and found significantly greater facial aging signs in the high-pollution urban setting[16]. This aligns with the concept that urbanisation is associated with accelerated extrinsic aging. In response, urban skincare has become a focus of research, aiming to develop products that protect against pollution particles (e.g. anti-adhesion polymers, chelators for metal pollutants) and to incorporate antioxidants that neutralize urban free radicals[5]. Urban planning and public health measures that improve air quality and green spaces can also be viewed as interventions that incidentally benefit skin health. In summary, living in a city tends to increase one’s exposure to several skin-aging factors, making preventive strategies particularly important for urban residents seeking to maintain youthful skin.

Conclusion

Cutaneous aging and appearance are profoundly influenced by one’s environment. Over the last decade, scientific advances have reinforced that extrinsic factors – UV radiation, visible light, temperature, humidity, pollution, and others – act in concert with time and genetics to shape skin aging. Figureatively, each day’s exposure to sun and pollutants writes tiny “wrinkles” into the skin’s story, which accumulate over years. UV radiation remains the most dominant factor, photoaging being essentially UV-driven damage. However, we now appreciate that the exposome is broad: even factors like ambient climate (heat/cold, moisture), air quality, and circadian alignment have measurable impacts on skin structure and function. Geographic context (latitude/altitude) determines the baseline intensity of some of these factors, while modern lifestyles (urban living, electronic screens, irregular sleep) add new dimensions to the challenge of healthy aging skin. For health and dermatology professionals, these insights underscore the importance of a holistic approach to skincare and anti-aging interventions. Photoprotection (sunscreen, clothing, sun avoidance) is paramount in all regions. Additionally, counseling patients on avoiding polluted environments when possible, using gentle cleansers and barrier creams to remove/guard against pollutants, maintaining moderate ambient conditions for the skin, and honoring good sleep hygiene can all contribute to better skin outcomes. At the research front, the 2015–2025 period has seen a surge in high-quality evidence – including epidemiologic studies and molecular research – that support these recommendations. Yet, gaps remain in fully quantifying each factor’s contribution and in developing targeted “anti-exposome” therapies. For example, anti-pollution skincare and blue-light blocking products are still evolving areas. Future research and innovation will likely focus on synergistic effects (e.g., how pollution and UV together accelerate aging) and personalized strategies to counteract environmental aging based on an individual’s specific exposomic profile. In conclusion, environmental, climatic, geographic, and astronomical factors each leave their imprint on the skin. Recognizing and addressing these factors is critical for anyone aiming to preserve skin health and beauty. By combining photoprotection, proper skincare, lifestyle modifications (like regular sleep), and possibly novel antioxidant or repair boosters, it is increasingly feasible to mitigate extrinsic skin aging. The skin, our interface with the environment, reflects the life we live; with prudent care against harmful exposures, we can help ensure that reflection remains youthful for longer.

References

1. Hussen NHA, Abdulla SK, Hasan AH, Mahmood SF, Qadir EE. Role of antioxidants in skin aging and the molecular mechanism of ROS: A comprehensive review. Aspects Mol Med. 2025;5:100063.
2. Wong QYA, Chew FT. Defining skin aging and its risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):22075.
3. Letsiou S, Koldiri E, Beloukas A, Rallis E, Kefala V. Deciphering the Effects of Different Types of Sunlight Radiation on Skin Function: A Review. Cosmetics (Basel). 2024;11(3):80.
4. Singh N, Wigmann C, Vijay P, Phuleria HC, Kress S, Majmudar G, et al. Combined Effect of Ambient Temperature and Relative Humidity on Skin Aging Phenotypes in the Era of Climate Change: Results From an Indian Cohort Study. Dermatitis. 2025;36(1):72-79.
5. Schikowski T, Hüls A. Air pollution and skin aging. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2020;7(1):58-64.
6. Su Z, Hu Q, Li X, Wang Z, Xie Y. The Influence of Circadian Rhythms on DNA Damage Repair in Skin Photoaging. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(20):10926.
7. Oyetakin-White P, Suggs A, Koo B, Matsui MS, Yarosh D, Cooper KD, et al. Does poor sleep quality affect skin ageing? Clin Exp Dermatol. 2015;40(1):17-22.
8. Panich U, Sittithumcharee G, Rathviboon N, Jirawatnotai S. Ultraviolet radiation-induced skin aging: the role of DNA damage and oxidative stress in epidermal stem cell damage mediated skin aging. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:7370642.
9. Farage MA, Miller KW, Elsner P, Maibach HI. Characteristics of the aging skin. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013;2(1):5-10.
10. Kitazawa M, Matsuo K, Nakagawa K, et al. Induced skin aging by blue-light irradiation in human skin fibroblasts via TGF-β, p38 MAPK, and SMAD pathways. J Dermatol Sci. 2023;111(2):111-118.
11. Lyons AB, Trullas C, Kohli I, Lim HW, Hamzavi IH. Visible light protection: an updated review of tinted sunscreens. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2025;41(1):41-50.
12. Hashiguchi N, Tochihara Y. A comparison of the effect of indoor thermal and humidity condition on skin dryness in winter. Indoor Built Environ. 2021;30(10):1745-1758.
13. Chen Y, Lyga J. Brain-skin connection: stress, inflammation and skin aging. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2014;13(3):177-90.
14. Tan J, Zheng Y, Tang X, et al. The urban heat island and its impact on heat waves and human health in Shanghai. Int J Biometeorol. 2010;54(1):75-84.
15. Ding A, Yang Y, Krämer U, et al. Indoor PM2.5 exposure affects skin aging manifestation in a Chinese population. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15329.
16. Hüls A, Vierkötter A, Gao W, et al. Traffic-related air pollution contributes to development of facial lentigines: further epidemiological evidence from Caucasians and Asians. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(5):1053-1056.
17. Vierkötter A, Schikowski T, Ranft U, et al. Airborne particle exposure and extrinsic skin aging. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(12):2719-26.
18. D'Orazio J, Jarrett S, Amaro-Ortiz A, Scott T. UV radiation and the skin. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(6):12222-48.
19. Vats P, Wildmann J, Dar WA, Hufnagl B, Goyal A. NRF2 signaling pathway and telomere length in aging and age-related diseases. Mol Cell Biochem. 2024;479(4):867-880.
20. Tan J, Zheng Y, Tang X, et al. The urban heat island and its impact on heat waves and human health in Shanghai. Int J Biometeorol. 2010;54(1):75-84.